Gamble Sands Headlines Washington’s Top-10 Public Golf Courses of 2017

Published on Monday, August 7th, 2017 in News | Slider

6

Palouse Ridge • Pullman

5-PalouseRidge

As was the case in 2015, Palouse Ridge rounds out the state’s “Super Six“ — that is, six courses whose vote totals distance themselves significantly from those below them. But it might not be “rounding out“ that group much longer.

The home course for the Washington State Cougars gained 10 percent on No. 5 Salish Cliffs in this year’s rankings, coming just eight points — one single, third-place vote — shy of scraping its way back into the state’s top-5, where it sat comfortably before Gamble Sands burst on the scene in 2014. Having also closed the gap on Salish Cliffs in 2015 (as compared to 2013), it stands to reason that as more time goes by, and more golfers make their way across the state to see what the fuss is about, Palouse Ridge’s status is only increasing.

As well it should. The Huskies on our staff have long since conceded Palouse Ridge’s overall excellence — and how could they not? Palouse combines the brawn of Salish Cliffs, and the look of feel of Wine Valley, with the panoramic views of Gamble Sands. That’s a winning formula even a Coug can understand.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11



9 Responses to “Gamble Sands Headlines Washington’s Top-10 Public Golf Courses of 2017”

  1. J Clark Says:

    I have not as yet gotten to play this course. My only experiences and input is that they seem to very proud in their course therefore their green fees are a bit out of my range. This is America and they can charge what the market will bear. My friends and I are not sold on the fact that it is worth it but as I said I have not played it and small chance that I will. Even though I drive by it every year on my annual Chelan golf trip. The second input I have received is a conversation with a local golfer who has played it and said that they were not impressed with it. It is well groomed but not necessarily tough. Although I have found that my game can make just about any course tough. All that said, Someday I will play, maybe.

  2. Kalii Says:

    Just my two cents, J Clark? Do yourself a favor and play it at least once. It’s worth it.

  3. Marlin Says:

    I find this Course worthless. It is routed terribly, overpriced and in the middle of nowhere. Oh and the staff are clueless.

  4. Chris P Says:

    Gamble Sands is not worthless, but it is not the best course in the state. I doubt that many have played it (I have), so I suspect it was voted based on the “press” it has received. Chamber’s Bay is good too, but their erratic greens should keep it out of the top space. In my mind, Washington National is the best, it is well laid out, completely legitimate, typically in good shape and allows all levels to enjoy it. The Olympic is very good too.

    Whoever voted for Kahler Glen should not be allowed to vote next year.

  5. Carl Says:

    I realize in order to have a vote counted you have to vote in the first place. I didn’t: That said. As a “west sider” I still rank Canyon Lakes in Kennewick, Apple Tree in Yakima and Bear Mountain in Chelan as some of my favorite courses. Hangman out of Spokane and the Creek at Qual Chan is also affordable and a great course.

    Also, the worst course I ever played was still better than a day at work…

  6. Erik Says:

    I work at this course and it’s amazing and most of the staff probably knows more about golf in our fingers than you do in your entire body

  7. Stephen Says:

    This course is fantastic! A course should never be judged on its difficulty unless it is too hard. Gamble Sands is appropriately priced in my opinion, its very comparable to other courses of its quality. I can’t wait to go back for a game.

  8. Brian Johnston Says:

    I played 5 rounds in 3 days here last week. 3 rounds from the back tees and 2 from the regular tees. The back tees unquestionably puts you into the teeth of the course while the regular tees take out much of the carry. We had a group of 16 and everyone enjoyed the golf course although the greens had been punched fairly recently and were covered in overseed. This was a disappointment to say the least. Not only were the greens extremely slow but many shots trying to use the contours surrounding the greens were hopeless as the ball would stay on the hillside instead of feeding to the green. This despite our organizer confirming the greens were in good shape.
    The accommodations on course were good but unfortunately the restaurant was sub standard. The restaurant menu needs an overhaul and the quality of food needs to be substantially better. When the restaurant is your only choice for food it needs to be great. Start with adding some oatmeal for breakfast accompanied with fruit and milk. It’s cheap and hard to screw up. I would give the course another go when the greens are running better but not so sure I would stay for multiple nights given the lack of quality food. I’m sure it’s a better course during normal conditions but it’s no Bandon Dunes!

  9. Jim barber Says:

    Scheduled to play it next week. Gamble says greens not to be punched till after closure next month. Someone’s putting out bum dope.


Leave a Reply